Website for exchange in the EuSoCo project

Luca Nogler/Udo Reifner (Eds.): Life Time Contracts

November 26, 2013 By: udo.reifner Category: Contents, LTC Book 2014


EuSoCo at University of Santiago de Compostela 17 October 2014

September 29, 2014 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: Contents, Presentations

The authors of the book LIFE TIME CONTRACTS  are invited for a presentation on October 17th, 2014 at the Centre of Corporate Social Responsibility, Governance and Investor protection of University of Santiago de Compostela (CERGI-USC).

Our EuSoCo-member Frey Nybergh will initiate the discussion with a lecture about “consumer consequences of the new 2014 Banking Directive”. The programm of the conference please download via the following link and feel invited to take part as guest or participant.


Book presentation – Luxemburg (4 Dec 2013)

January 09, 2014 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: Contents, Presentations

Book Presentation

EuSoCo Group (Authors)

Social Long-term Contracts in European Law

December 4, 2013

Organizer: EuroPriLex Group

Read the rest of this entry →

EuSoCo declaration (en/de/fr/it/es)

October 08, 2013 By: udo.reifner Category: 1. EuSoCo, Contents, EuSoCo Declaration, LTC Book 2014


Download Adobe .pdf

EuSoCo declaration (en/de/fr/it/es)

With the present declaration the EuSoCo group introduces the new book on Lifetime Contracts which will soon be published at Eleven Publishers The Netherlands. An outline of its contents can be retrieved here: eusoco_book


1We, a group of academics knowledgeable in consumer, tenancy and labour law, are deeply concerned that the path to a harmonised European system of contract law as envisaged by the European Commission and the Parliament will be built on a reductive model of commercial and consumer sales, where information is the only substantive concession to social interests. 2Economic and social rights of workers, consumers and tenants in long-term relations have got no adequate place. 3 This is the case for the Consumer Rights Directive of 2011, which has as its core element the sales law model. Other instances can be found in the Consumer Credit Directive of 2008 and in the Directives concerning labour, which turn life time contracts into synallagmatic spot relations. In the modern service and credit society the new understanding of such contractual relations at the EU as well as national level poses a threat to the achievements in social protection with regard to life time contracts. 4The liberal sales model of information is indifferent to life time, provides no sufficient Read the rest of this entry →

Principles of Lifetime Contracts – EN/DE/IT/FR/ES Winter 2013

October 08, 2013 By: udo.reifner Category: LTC Principles

Principles of social long-term contracts (EN)

1. Life time contracts: Life time contracts are long-term social relationships providing goods, services and opportunities for work and income-creation. They are essential for the self-realisation of individuals and their participation in society at various stages in their life.

2. Human Dimension: The subject matter of life time contracts is real-life circumstances. The role of the law governing them is to frame the power relationships of those contracts in terms of human development, so that on-going co-operation rather than the formation of the contract lies at the heart of the contractual relationship. Personal relations (like for example the family) have to be taken into account.

3. Long-term relationship: Mutual trust between the parties as to the durability of the long-term relationship must be protected and early termination must have only future effect, having no bearing on the contract prior to that point. Early termination must be restricted to circumstances in which the freedom and the autonomy of the individual is at issue and makes early termination necessary.

4. Linked contracts: Life time contracts are embedded in a network of linked contracts to which the law must have regard when legal questions fall to be decided.

5. Basic needs: The provision of essential goods and services for basic needs related to consumption and employment requires that physical, social and psychological considerations be taken into account in order to ensure the protection the weaker party to the contract. Stringent regulation or other collective rules will secure the degree of social protection needed in line with the subject matter of the contract, its duration and its importance in the life of the individuals concerned.

6. Productive use: The provider of essential goods and services or income-generating opportunities under a life time contract must avoid taking any action which will jeopardise the social purpose of the contract and the productive used of the rendered services.

7. Collective and ethical dimensions: Employees and consumers are entitled to expect that the collective aspect of their individual interests is safeguarded by the state through collective representation mechanisms, together with the application of general values of good morals and good faith which influence access, formation, contents, adaptation and dissolution of such relationships.

8. Access: Providers of life time contracts must refrain from discrimination in terms of the personal and social characteristics of consumers at all stages of the contract, from access to termination, including discrimination in terms of the group of intended users of the contract, or individual members of that group. The importance of life time contracts in meeting the basic human needs of subsistence, employment and participation in economic life gives access to these goods, services and income opportunities the status of fundamental human right (distributive justice).

9. Remuneration: The mutual obligations of life time contracts shall not be grossly disproportionate. Prices must be transparent and nondiscriminatory and the charges must be affordable and in line with the costs.

10. Adaptation: If the social and economic circumstances upon which a life time contract is based have changed significantly since the contract was entered into, or if material circumstances from which the parties derived have arisen that are found to be at variance with its original situation to such an extent that the social nature of the contract is jeopardised, and if the parties would not have entered into the contract or would have entered into it on different terms had they foreseen this change, adaptation of the contract may be required if, taking into account all the circumstances of the specific case, and in particular the contractual or statutory allocation of risk and the fundamental obligation of a human being, one of the parties cannot reasonably be expected to continue to comply with the contract without variation of its terms. Collective regulation shall take precedence over individual adaptation.

11. Termination: Termination of life time contracts imposed on workers and consumers must be transparent, accountable and socially responsible. Early termination against the will of the consumer, tenant or worker must be a measure of last resort. Disclosure of true and fair grounds for termination must be non-discriminatory and be provided a reasonable period before termination comes into effect. The only grounds for termination are personal behaviour of such significance as to merit termination, or financial circumstances or interests on the part of the provider which materially affect the viability of the subject matter of the contract. Where the reasons for termination are financial in nature, users are entitled to have recourse to mechanisms of collective redress, including the right of the individual to be heard or represented. This procedure must allow sufficient time for users to put forward measures preventing termination and/or its consequences. As far as the termination in in the interest of that party which has developed the contract and organised the service it has to consider the interest of the other party with due diligence.

12. Communication: Throughout the contractual relationship, from the beginning of the process of negotiation of the contract to its termination, a continuing and co-operative dialogue must be established on an equal basis and at a personal level between the parties with regard to fulfilling the purpose of the contract. Such a discussion must take place before each stage in the contract (formation, adaptation, termination) and communications must at all times be based on the principle of trust and confidence.

13. Information and Transparency: During the negotiation of the contract and for the life time of the contract accurate, complete, timely and understandable information must be provided which is adequate to overcome any information asymmetry that arises.

14. Securing livelihood: Where life time contracts provide for regular income, making it available according to time and place, or for payments to be drawn from that income, a minimum level of income must be guaranteed in the form of continuing payments sufficient to meet the consumer’s subsistence needs and, if applicable, protection must be provided from attachment of income, seizure and individual voluntary arrangements with creditors.

15. Exclusion: The social risks of unemployment, homelessness and overindebtedness must be taken into account in both the individual and the collective forms of the contract with due regard to its social origin and in line with public law.

16. Confidentiality: Personal data obtained during a life time contractual relationship and assessments based on such data must be treated confidentially and only be used for the purpose of the contract. Read the rest of this entry →

4th EuSoCo meeting in Trento, 28/29th September 2012

September 29, 2012 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: 2012 Trento

Place: Universita Degli Studi Di Trento

Date: 28/29 September 2012

Participation: Luca Nogler (Universita Degli Studi Di Trento); Udo Reifner (Universita Degli Studi Di Trento);  Frey Nybergh (University of Helsinki); Andrea Nicolussi  (Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano); Luisa Antoniolli (Universita Degli Studi Di Trento); Toni Williams (University of Kent);  Orsola Razzolini (Universita Bocconi); Geraint Howells (University of Manchester); Juana Pulgar (Universidad Complutense de Madrid); Christoph Schmid (ZERP Bremen);  Elena Bargelli (University of Pisa); Candida Leone (University of Amsterdam); Helena Klinger (Universität Hamburg)

Project partners unable to attend: Maurice Tancelin (in the past Université Laval); Riccardo Salomone, Fabio Pantano (Universita di Parma); Florian Rödl (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt); Ruben Houweling/L.J.M. Langedijk (Amsterdam); Eva Kocher (Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt O.); Elena F. Perez-Carrilló (Universidad Santiago de Compostella; Vincent Forray (Université McGill, Montréal/Québec)

Objectives of the meeting

Goal of the last EuSoCo-meeting was to present the current state of our book project by means of the contributions. The lectures should summarize the contributions and build the material for a fruitful discussion. On the basis of exchanged views, received comments and critical hints from the audience the reflection should be developed with regard to the contributions as well as to the principles of long-term contracts. The result of our last final meeting was to know where we stand on the issues of this project: what are our main shared ideas and demands with regard to a new European contract law and who will support these concepts of our project by a contribution.

Recent EU Draft CESL discussed in Chicago – “European Contract Law: A Law-and-Economics Perspective” (April 27, 2012)

May 15, 2012 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: European Sales Law

Conference on ‘European contract law: a law-and-economics perspective‘ in Chicago considered a wide range of views on the development of European contract law, focusing on the European Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law (CESL).

While the proposed CESL met some heavy criticism from speakers from both sides of the Atlantic, suggestions for improvement and for the further development of European contract law took diverging directions. In general, and perhaps not surprising in light of the economic angle of the conference, it appeared that the US speakers were rather sceptical about further-going regulation of consumer transactions in the EU’s internal market. The European speakers, on the other hand, mostly sought to combine their criticism with suggestions for the elaboration of measures of EU contract law within the existing acquis communautaire. The different approaches generated a lively debate on general issues (harmonisation, regulatory competition, mandatory rules, optional instruments) as well as specific topics (consumer protection techniques, the doctrine of mistake, remedies, custom, precontractual liability, Eurobarometer surveys).

Read the rest of this entry →

BEUC preliminary position paper on the CESL

April 13, 2012 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: General & discussions

Common European Sales Law – BEUC’s preliminary Position on the Commission’s proposal for a regulation on a (COM(2011) 635 final)

See website


EP Legal Affairs Committee publishes a reprot on the Optional Instrument

March 07, 2012 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: European Sales Law

Implementation of Optional Instruments within European Civil Law

Date :16-01-2012 Study

Authors : Bénédicte FAUVARQUE-COSSON (Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris II, France ; Trans Europe Experts – TEE) and Martine BEHAR-TOUCHAIS (Sorbonne School of Law, Paris I, France ; Trans Europe Experts – TEE)

Committees : Legal affairs

Executive summary : Version EN Version DE

Optional European Sales Law: ERA Conference 9-10 February 2012

January 19, 2012 By: S.Clerc-Renaud Category: European Sales Law

In a few weeks’ time, the European Law Academy will be hosting a 2 day conference discussing the ESL. Entitles: AN OPTIONAL EUROPEAN SALES LAW – THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL AND ITS PERSPECTIVES. Taking place in Trier, 9-10 February 2012; ERA Conference Centre; Metzer Allee 4, Trier, Germany.

The ERA Programme ESL Feb 2012 is available here.
On the Friday, EuSoCo Group partner Bob Schmitz will be speaker on one of the panels, we hope he will make allusions to our efforts and forthcoming publication. Following him will be BEUC representative Ursula Pachl with her critique of the ESL.

09:00     Comparing B2C and B2B contracts (Which rules are different? Why?

Dora Szentpaly-Kleis and Ursula Pachl

11:00     B2C: Added value for consumers or cost driver for enterprises?

Hanne Melin and Bob Schmitz